Jon Paul Fiorentino
is an ex-Winnipegger who escaped the empty blue skies and streets of
downtown Transcona, a suburb of Winnipeg, for the gentle sweep of Mount
Royal against the horizon and the pedestrian-filled streets of Montreal.
This is his fifth book (if indeed this is a book, but more about that
later), after four collections of poetry and a collection of well-received
short fictions called Asthmatica.
I, on the other
hand, am the hometown reviewer with the unenviable task of reviewing
Fiorentino's book.
Stripmalling
is an odd book that is neither fish nor fowl. ECW Press calls it "A
misfit book" but the front cover bills the book as a novel. The problem
is that the book is not constructed like a novel and the competing texts
suggest it should not be read like your traditional novel. The book
is part journal, part failed comedy routine, part graphic novel, and
concludes with a fragment of a workshopped script for a play or movie,
which includes comments by an imaginary writing instructor. We are clearly
reading an experimental text, and one that comes with all the trappings
we can expect from an après post-modern book: satire, puns, playful
erotica, a self-deprecating unreliable narrator whose tongue is firmly
planted in his cheek or wishing it was in someone else's cheek, and
a variety of literary genres, including illustrated scenes from the
book in graphic novel style.
It's a novel in
many voices--all of them mine: the character Jonny, the writer Jonny,
and the miserable real-life Jonny. But please note that, as usual, all
three Jonnies are fictional. The real Jonny can found on Lavalife under
the tag, sweaty4u2009.(14)
The playful mixing
of fact with fiction and the deliberate confusion and unwillingness
to separate one from/form the other is a well-worn post-modern conceit.
But in this story the hyper-self awareness--a kind of "look ma no hands"
gesture (or "look at me I am a writer writing about writing") sometimes
gets in the way of the storytelling.
Nevertheless, the
whimsical off-handed humour and tone do make for some outrageously funny
scenes that remind one of the sixties poet Richard Brautigan, who effortlessly,
it seemed, mixed pop-culture references with highbrow ideas. Fiorentino's
tone and pose is equally casual and deceptively simple.
The pose in this
case is that of the writer as loser and one who wants to be womanizer
but is hopelessly inept as a lover of Dora or as a gas-jockey for Shill
or later as a store clerk for Hypermart.
The voice and character
of Jonny also brings to mind how Woody Allan blended together his 'real'
neurotic self with the imaginary one we watched in such film classics
as Annie Hall. The problem here, however, is not one of being
unable to distinguish reality from fiction but the writing and how the
story unfolds.
Here, for example,
is Fiorentino describing a character called Darren, the man Dora invites
for a threesome: "Darren was hypermuscular, had tattoos all over his
hairless arms, and both of his nipples were pierced. He had long, flowing,
curly brown locks and the face of a cherub." (20)
Firorentino is
not afraid to write cliches, in this case what appears to be a porn
cliche. But whatever happened to elegance and grace in a sentence or--dare
we say it--beauty or craft or the power to render a scene accurately
and with precision? Perhaps we are asking for too much from a story
that is essentially a sardonic tall tale.
The book basically
tells the story of Jonny's quest to become a writer. The humorous thing
is he lives in his car on a strip mall in dull and boring Transcona.
There is also the attendant desire for a relationship with Dora (the
explorer) and to simultaneously escape the fate of a gas-jockey for
Shill (corporate evil incarnate) and later his job as a store clerk
at Hypermart. (Please note the use of puns and the easy targets of corporate
evil, Shell and Wal-Mart.)
Jonny, however,
is a buffoon. His failure as a gas-jockey has some ludic moments but
he is eventually fired for selling drugs on the side as well as being
insubordinate (he refuses to tuck in his shirt) to his boss. Jonny's
innocent and naive voice has its funny moments, and there are some funny
one-liners sprinkled here and there throughout the text like confectionery,
but one cannot shake the feeling that for the most part his dumb naivety
is contrived and condescending and represents a type of contemporary
hipness. In other words, his voice and character are the pop culture
cultivation of the nerd or loser as hero.
Jonny's character
and mock-heroic ambition to write, his hapless jobs and love life, and
his mid-life crisis do not elicit our sympathy in part because he is
grounded in this contemporary pop culture cliche and therefore comes
across more as a cartoon character than a fully drawn fictional character.
It may be fun to be dumb and fun to write and mock the pretensions of
the dumb (and the soul-destroying evils of banal jobs) but there is
not much to latch on to after you have finished reading the book. The
book is the literary equivalent of Chinese food; initially satisfying
but after awhile not very filling.
This is a book
that aspires to be fresh, cutting edge in its use of genres, and droll
and anarchistic in its attitudes, all the while looking over its shoulder
and seeking approval from the very world it mocks. Alas, I guess that
is called being an artist these days.